Radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging: a bibliometric study in Iran

Document Type: Systematic Review/Meta-analysis

Author

Medical Imaging Systems Lab, Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging (RCMCI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays, science mapping is considered an excellent technique for decision-makers to find solutions for problems in research planning and development. In this work, we aimed to depict a science map of “radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging” in Iran. Methods: All publications indexed in Thomson Reuters Web of Science database in the fields mentioned above with at least one affiliation corresponding to “Iran” were included in the study. “Visualization of similarities” (VOS) viewer software was then utilized to analyze the data for generating density maps and density cluster maps of organizations, authors, and journals based on bibliographic coupling and co-citation similarity measures. Results: Various maps were then formed and discussed. Tehran University of Medical Sciences in all fields of radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging was proved to be the dominant organization in the country. Conclusion: Applying VOSviewer software, data was analyzed for extracting bibliographic coupling and co-citation relations and theirs corresponding science maps in terms of affiliated organizations, authors, and publishing journals. More comprehensive studies can be performed to obtain more mature science maps. Performing such analyses for other countries and then comparing with the internal science maps can be useful for decision-makers.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Boyack KW, Klavans R. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2010;61(12):2389-404.

Kessler MM. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am Doc. 1963;14(1):10-25.

Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1973;24:265–9.

Egghe L, Rousseau R. Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks. Scientometrics. 2002;55(3):349-61.

Garfield E. From bibliographic coupling to co-citation analysis via algorithmic historio-bibliography. Speech delivered at Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, November 27, 2001.

Braam RR, Moed HF, van Raan AFJ. Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural Aspects. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1991;42(4):233-51.

From the editors. knowledge combination: a cocitation analysis. Acad Manage J. 2010;53(3):441-50.

Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. In: Advances in data analysis: Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the German Classification Society. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2007. P. 299-306.

Van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Dekker R, Van den Berg J. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2010;61(12):2405-16.

Waltman L, Van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J  Informetr. 2010;4(4):629-35.

Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsl. 2011;7(3):50-4.

Van Eck, NJ, Waltman L. VOSviewer: A computer program for bibliometric mapping. In: Larsen B, Leta J. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. 2009;886-897.

Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523-38.

Liu X, Zhan FB, Hong S, Niu B, Liu Y. A bibliometric study of earthquake research: 1900-2010. Scientometrics. 2012;92(3):747-65.

Leydesdorff L, Carley S, Rafols I. Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics. 2013;94(2):589-93.

Ma FC, Lyu PH, Yao Q, Yao L, Zhang SJ. Publication trends and knowledge maps of global translational medicine research. Scientometrics. 2013.

VOSviewer 2013 [cited 2013 23 June]. Available from: http://www.VOSviewer.com/publications/.

Van Eck NJ, Walters L. Manual for VOSviewer version 1.5.4. 2013 1 January.

Tryfos P. Cluster Analysis.  Methods for Business Analysis and Forecasting: Text and Cases. 1st ed. Wiley; 1998.

Zarifmahmoudi L, Sadeghi R. Comparison of ISI web of knowledge, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar h-indices of Iranian nuclear medicine scientists. Iran J Nucl Med. 2012;20(1):1-4.

Zhao D, Strotmann A. All-author vs. first-author co-citation analysis of the information science field using Scopus. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, 2007.

Ramin S, Sarraf Shirazi A. Comparison between Impact factor, SCImago journal rank indicator and Eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2012 Aug 27;15(2):132-6.