Determining an accurate method to estimate GFR in renal transplant recipients with stable serum creatinine levels

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Cochin, Kerala, India

Abstract

Introduction:Detecting renal allograft dysfunction early will allow timely diagnosis and treatment. There is no objective recommendation by national kidney societies for glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) estimation in post-transplant setting. 99mTc-DTPA Technetium-99m Diethylene triamine penta acetic acid) renogram can identify early renal dysfunction much before serum creatinine levels get deranged. Our objectives are: 1) We hypothesised that if Gates formula is depth corrected for anteriorly placed renal allograft, can it serve as a reliable, accurate investigation 2) To compare how DTPA renogram with depth correction (CT based) and without depth correction (fixed distance) fares with creatinine based MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease), and CKD-EPI Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equations in transplant recipients in our population. GFR values were compared with gold standard venous blood GFR single sampling method in a few patients. 
Methods:Forty adults live related adult renal allograft recipients with serum creatinine values of less than 2.0 mg/dl at 6 months follow-up were enrolled.
Results: Mean measured GFR was calculated for 4 different methods along with single plasma sampling method. MDRD and CKD-EPI equations showed higher values in our study but correlated well with each other in GFR estimation. Accuracy was highest with GFR derived from depth corrected DTPA renogram (69.2%) than for fixed depth method (60 %, p ¼ 0.0012). GFR obtained by DTPA depth correction method also showed good correlation to SPSM.
Conclusion: 99mTc-DTPA based GFR estimation with depth correction is not affected by serum creatinine level and showed highest accuracy.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Oct;42(4 Suppl 3):S1-201.
  2. Taylor AT. Radionuclides in nephrourology, part 1: Radiopharmaceuticals, quality control, and quantitative indices. J Nucl Med. 2014 Apr;55(4):608-15.
  3. Popper H, Mandel E. Filtrations and reabsorptions leitung in der nierenpathologie. Erg Inn Med Kinder 1937;53:685-95.
  4. Desirable Biological Variation Database specifications.   http://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm (Accessed 15 November 2019).
  5. Mula-Abed WA, Al Rasadi K, Al-Riyami D. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): A serum creatinine-based test for the detection of chronic kidney disease and its impact on clinical practice. Oman Med J. 2012 Mar;27(2):108-13.
  6. Santos J, Martins LS. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: Still searching for the best marker. World J Nephrol. 2015 Jul 6;4(3):345-53.
  7. Horber FF, Scheidegger J, Frey FJ. Overestimation of renal function in glucocorticosteroid treated patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1985;28(5):537-41.
  8. Berglund F, Killander J, Pompeius R. Effect of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on the renal excretion of creatinine in man. J Urol. 1975 Dec;114(6):802-8.
  9. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:S1–266.
  10. Botev R, Mallié JP, Couchoud C, Schück O, Fauvel JP, Wetzels JF, Lee N, De Santo NG, Cirillo M. Estimating glomerular filtration rate: Cockcroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formulas compared to renal inulin clearance. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 May;4(5):899-906.
  11. Pöge U, Gerhardt T, Palmedo H, Klehr HU, Sauerbruch T, Woitas RP. MDRD equations for estimation of GFR in renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2005 Jun;5(6):1306-11.
  12. Florkowski CM, Chew-Harris JS. Methods of Estimating GFR - Different Equations Including CKD-EPI. Clin Biochem Rev. 2011 May;32(2):75-9.
  13. Townamchai N, Praditpornsilpa K, Chawatanarat T, Avihingsanon Y, Tiranathanagul K, Katavetin P, Susantitaphong P, Kanjanabuch T, Tungsanga K, Eiam-Ong S. The validation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation for renal transplant recipients. Clin Nephrol. 2013 Mar;79(3):206-13.
  14. Kamaruzaman L, Mohd R, Zaki FM, Hod R, Aziz AA. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in adult kidney transplant recipients in the Asian population. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2019 May-Jun;30(3):587-596. 
  15. Gates GF. Glomerular filtration rate: estimation from fractional renal accumulation of 99mTc-DTPA (stannous). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Mar;138(3):565-70.
  16. Gates GF. Split renal function testing using Tc-99m DTPA. A rapid technique for determining differential glomerular filtration. Clin Nucl Med. 1983 Sep;8(9):400-7.
  17. Gates GF.Computation of glomerular filtration rate with technetium-99m-DTPA an: in-house computer program. J Nucl Med 1984;25:613- 6I8.
  18. Tønnesen KH, Munck O, Hald T. Zum Winkel K, Mlaufox MD, Funck-Bretano JL. Influence on the radiorenogram of variation in skin to kidney distance and the clinical importance hereof. In: Zum Winkle K, Mllaufox MD, Funck-Bretano JL, Editors. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Radionuclides in Nephrourology. Stuttgart: Thieme;1974. p. 79–86.
  19. Granerus G, Moonen M. Effects of extra-renal background subtraction and kidney depth correction in the measurement of GFR by gamma camera renography. Nucl Med Commun. 1991 Jun;12(6):519-27.
  20. Maneval DC, Magill HL, Cypess AM, Rodman JH. Measurement of skin-to-kidney distance in children: implications for quantitative renography. J Nucl Med. 1990 Mar;31(3):287-91.
  21. Lachance SL, Adamson D, Barry JM. Ultrasonically determined kidney transplant hypertrophy. J Urol. 1988 Mar;139(3):497-8.
  22. Ma G, Shao M, Xu B, Tian J, Chen Y. Establish new formulas for the calculation of renal depth in both children and adults. Clin Nucl Med. 2015 Jul;40(7):e357-62.
  23. Taylor A, Lewis C, Giacometti A, Hall EC, Barefield KP. Improved formulas for the estimation of renal depth in adults. J Nucl Med. 1993 Oct;34(10):1766-9.
  24. Pöge U, Gerhardt T, Stoffel-Wagner B, Sauerbruch T, Woitas RP. Validation of the CKD-EPI formula in patients after renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Dec;26(12):4104-8.  
  25. White CA, Akbari A, Doucette S, Fergusson D, Knoll GA. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: is the new chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equation any better? Clin Chem. 2010 Mar;56(3):474-7.
  26. Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T, Zhang YL, Beck GJ, Froissart M, Hamm LL, Lewis JB, Mauer M, Navis GJ, Steffes MW, Eggers PW, Coresh J, Levey AS. Comparative performance of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equations for estimating GFR levels above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Am Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Sep;56(3):486-95.