Assessment of whole-body occupational radiation exposures in nuclear medicine practices of Bangladesh during 2010-2014

Rahman, Mohammad Sohelur; Begum, Aleya; Hoque, Ashraful; Khan, Rezaul Karim; Siraz, Miah Mohammad Mahfuz

Assessment of whole-body occupational radiation exposures in nuclear medicine practices of Bangladesh during 2010-2014

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Health Physics Division, Atomic Energy Centre, 4 Kazi Nazrul Islam Avenue, Shahbag, Dhaka, Bangladesh

² Physical Science Division, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, E-12/A, Agargaon, Sher-e-Banglanagar, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract

Introduction: Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation due to medical activities (both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures) has increased sharply in recent years. Among the occupationally exposed workers in these fields, those most affected by this increased exposure to ionizing radiation are nuclear medicine workers. In this study, annual average effective dose, annual collective effective dose, the individual dose distribution ratio, collective dose distribution ratio, frequency of dose ranges of workers in nuclear medicine departments of Bangladesh during the period 2010-2014 are presented and discussed. Methods:Annually about 300 workers of nuclear medicine departments were monitored using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). The TLDs were readout using Harshaw TLD readers (Model-4500 and Model 6600 plus) for quarterly basis to evaluate the whole-body doses of workers. Results:The annual average effective doses of workers are well below the annual average dose limit prescribed by national regulations and international organizations. Majority (95%) of workers received doses less than 1 mSv and only 0.33% workers received doses higher than 10 mSv. The annual average effective dose of workers is three times lower than the worldwide average effective dose quoted by UNSCEAR. However, the annual average effective dose of monitored workers is comparable to dose received by workers in Turkey and France. Conclusion: The status and trends in occupational doses show that radiation protection at the majority of the workplace is satisfactory. In spite of that, additional measures are required due to large variations observed in the maximum individual doses over the last 5 years.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Medical Physics, Dosimetry, Instrumentation and Radiobiology

References

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the general assembly of the United Nations with scientific annexes, New York: United Nations sales publication. 2000; E.00.IX.3.

Council of the European Union. Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. Official J Eur Commun. 1997;L 180/22.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. (NCRP Report No. 160). Bethesda, MD: 2009.

International Atomic Energy Agency. International Basic Safety Standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources (Safety Series No. 115). Vienna: IAEA; 1996.

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21 (1-3). Oxford: Pergamon Press;1990.

Colgan PA, Currivan L, Fenton D. An assessment of annual whole-body occupational radiation exposure in Ireland (1996-2005). Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;128(1):12-20.

Barrall RC, Smith SI. Personnel radiation exposure and protection from 99mTc radiations. In: Kereiakes JG, Corey KR. Biophysical aspects of the medical use of technetium-99m. Monograph No. 1. New York: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 1976. p. 77.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Implementation of the principle of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) for medical and dental personnel. (NCRP Report No. 107). Bethesda, MD: 1990.

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Ionizing radiation: sources and biological effects. Report to the general assembly of the United Nations with scientific annexes, New York: United Nations sales publication. 1982; E82. IX.8.

Bangladesh Atomic Energy Regulatory (BAER) Act-2012 (Act No. 19 of 2012); 2012.

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The 2007 Recommendations of International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37 (2- 4). Oxford: Elsevier; 2007.

International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards. General safety requirements part-3. Vienna:IAEA; 2014.

The Nuclear Safety and Radiation Control (NSRC) Rules-1997 of Bangladesh (SRO No. 205-Law/97); 1997.

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). ICRP Statement on Tissue Reactions / Early and Late Effects of Radiation in Normal Tissues and Organs – Threshold Doses for Tissue Reactions in a Radiation Protection Context. ICRP Publication 118. Ann. ICRP 41(1/2); 2012.

Harshaw Model 4500, Manual TLD Workstation Operator’s Manual (Cochran Road, Solon, Ohio) (Pub. No. 4500-0-O-0598-002, 6801); 1998.

Harshaw TLD Model 6600 Plus Automatic TLD reader user manual. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.; 2007. Available on: http://www.kortec.cz/files/thermo/TLDModel6600.pdf.

International Atomic Energy Agency. Assessment of occupational exposures due to external sources of radiation. Safety Guides Series No. RS-G-1.3. Vienna: IAEA; 1999.

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). General principles for the radiation protection of workers. Pergamon Press: Ann. ICRP 27 (1); 1997.

Hart D, Wall BF. Radiation exposure to the UK population from medical and dental x-ray examinations. National Radiological Protection Board, NRPB-W4; 2004.

Martins MB, Alves JG, Abrantes JN, Roda AR. Occupational exposure in nuclear medicine in Portugal in the 1999-2003 period. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2007;125(1-4):130-4.

Piwowarska-Bilska H, Birkenfeld B, Gwardyś A, Supińska A, Listewnik MH, Elbl B, Cichoń-Bańkowska K. Occupational exposure at the Department of Nuclear Medicine as a work environment: A 19-year follow-up. Pol J Radiol. 2011 Apr;76(2):18-21.

Gündüz H, Zeyrek CT, Aksu L, Işak S. Occupational exposure to ionising radiation in the region of Anatolia, Turkey for the period 1995-1999. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;108(4):293-301.

Zeyrek CT, Gündüz H. Occupational exposure to ionising radiation with thermoluminescence dosimetry system in Turkey, in 2003. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;113(4):374-80.

Hasford F, Owusu-Banahene J, Amoako JK, Otoo F, Darko EO, Emi-Reynolds G, Yeboah J, Arwui CC, Adu S. Assessment of annual whole-body occupational radiation exposure in medical practice in Ghana (2000-09). Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 May;149(4):431-7.

Weizhang W, Wenyi Z, Ronglin C, Liang'an Z. Occupational exposures of Chinese medical radiation workers in 1986-2000. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(4):440-3.

Feuardent J, Scanff P, Crescini D, Rannou A. Occupational external exposure to ionising radiation in France (2005-2011). Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013 Dec;157(4):610-18.

Kamenopoulou V, Drikos G, Dimitriou P. Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in Greece (1994-1998). Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2000;91(4):385-9.

Velasques de Oliveira SM, Santos DS, Cunha PG. Occupational exposure in nuclear medicine in Brazil. World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering 2006. IFMBE Proceedings. 2007;14(4):2114-17.

Valuckas KP, Atkocius V, Samerdokiene V. Occupational exposure of medical radiation workers in Lithuania, 1991-2003. Acta Medica Lithuanica. 2007;14(3):155-9.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) training material on radiation protection in nuclear medicine, part 5. Vienna: IAEA; December 2004.