Characterization of low, medium and high energy collimators for common isotopes in nuclear medicine: A Monte Carlo study

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

2 Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern, Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

3 Department of Medical Physics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

4 Yazd Diabetes Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

5 Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

6 Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

7 Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran


Introduction:In an ideal parallel-hole collimator, thickness of septal material should be sufficient to stop more than 95% of incident photons. However, some photons pass the septa without interaction or experience scattering before they reach the detector. In this study, we determined different contribution of collimator responses consist of geometrical response, septal penetration (SP) and scattering (SC) for low, medium and high energy collimators.
Methods: A point source of activity with common energies in diagnostic nuclear medicine and three different collimators were simulated using SIMIND Monte Carlo code.
Results: For Low Energy High Resolution (LEHR) collimator, SP was increased from 7% in 140 keV to 30% in 167keV and more than 75% in energies higher than 296keV. SC also was increased from 4% in 98keV to more than 15% in energies higher than 167keV and reached to its maximum (26%) in 296keV. For Medium Energy All Purpose (MEAP) collimator, SP was suddenly increased from 6% in 186keV to 28% for 296keV and more than 50% for higher energies. SC was also increased from 4% in energies below 186keV to 15% in 296keV and about 30% for higher energies. For High Energy (HE) collimator, SP was about 20% for 364keV photons. SC was 15% for 364keV photons and only 65% of photons were geometrically collimated.

Conclusion: Our results showed that even by using nominally suitable collimators, there are considerable SC and SP that influence the quantitative accuracy of planar and SPECT images. The magnitude of geometrical response, SC and SP depend on collimator geometric structure and photons energy.


Main Subjects

  1. Webb S, Binnie DM, Flower MA, Ott RJ. Monte Carlo modelling of the performance of a rotating slit-collimator for improved planar gamma-camera imaging. Phys Med Biol. 1992 May;37(5):1095-108.
  2. Kimiaei S, Ljungberg M, Larsson SA. Evaluation of optimally designed planar-concave collimators in single-photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997 Nov;24(11):1398-404.
  3. Derenzo SE. Monte Carlo calculations of the detection efficiency of arrays of NaI (Tl), BGO, CsF, Ge, and plastic detectors for 511 keV photons. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1981;28(1):131-6.
  4. Lopes M, Chepel V, Carvalho J, Ferreira Marques R, Policarpo A. Performance analysis based on a Monte Carlo simulation of a liquid Xenon PET detector. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1995;42(6):2298-302.
  5. Ghazanfari N, Sarkar S, Loudos G, Ay MR. Quantitative assessment of crystal material and size on the performance of rotating dual head small animal PET scanners using Monte Carlo modeling. Hell J Nucl Med. 2012 Jan-Apr;15(1):33-9.
  6. Kalantari F, Rajabi H, Yaghoobi N. Optimized energy window configuration for 201Tl imaging. J Nucl Med Technol. 2008 Mar;36(1):36-43.
  7. Yokoi T, Shinohara H, Onishi H. Performance evaluation of OSEM reconstruction algorithm incorporating three-dimensional distance-dependent resolution compensation for brain SPECT: a simulation study. Ann Nucl Med. 2002 Feb;16(1):11-8.
  8. Narita Y, Eberl S, Iida H, Hutton BF, Braun M, Nakamura T, Bautovich G. Monte Carlo and experimental evaluation of accuracy and noise properties of two scatter correction methods for SPECT. Phys Med Biol. 1996 Nov;41(11):2481-96.
  9. Metz CE, Atkins FB, Beck RN. The geometric transfer function component for scintillation camera collimators with straight parallel holes. Phys Med Biol. 1980 Nov;25(6):1059-70.
  10. Zaidi H. Quantitative analysis in nuclear medicine imaging. Springer; 2006.
  11. Sadremomtaz A, Telikani Z. Evaluation of the performance of parallel-hole collimator for high resolution small animal SPECT: A Monte Carlo study. Iran J Nucl Med. 2016;24(2):136-43.
  12. Ljungberg M, Strand SE. A Monte Carlo program for the simulation of scintillation camera characteristics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1989 Aug;29(4):257-72.
  13. Formiconi AR. Geometrical response of multihole collimators. Phys Med Biol. 1998 Nov;43(11):3359-79.
  14. Kalantari F, Rajabi H, Saghari M. Quantification and reduction of the collimator-detector response effect in SPECT by applying a system model during iterative image reconstruction: a simulation study. Nucl Med Commun. 2012 Mar;33(3):228-38.
  15. Pandey AK, Sharma SK, Karunanithi S, Kumar P, Bal C, Kumar R. Characterization of parallel-hole collimator using Monte Carlo Simulation. Indian J Nucl Med. 2015 Apr-Jun;30(2):128-34.
  16. Islamian JP, Toossi MT, Momennezhad M, Zakavi SR, Sadeghi R, Ljungberg M. Monte carlo study of the effect of collimator thickness on T-99m source response in single photon emission computed tomography. World J Nucl Med. 2012 May;11(2):70-4.